Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Tarnished connectors

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Tarnished connectors
From: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 16:16:05 -0700
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
I agree.  Also when going to gold, most  (all)  commercial plating shops will put down a nickle barrier on the base metal then plate with gold.  If the gold is too thin and the skin depth too deep, your gold surface is RF wise, actually nickle.

I once designed a test station for X-band IMPATT diodes and we built the prototype 1/4-height waveguide oscillator in-house and did our own plating in the model shop.  Since we were going to calibrate and supply a number of these to our IMPATT vendors, we had the design replicated and sent the plating job to an outside vendor.  If you simply specify minimum total plating thickness, you get lots of nickle and a flash of gold.  It took lots of hours to figure out why we weren't getting any power output.

If the connectors are silver, I use Tarn-X to brighten them.

Wes N7WS


On 8/20/2019 1:10 PM, Richard (Rick) Karlquist wrote:


On 8/20/2019 10:58 AM, k7lxc--- via TowerTalk wrote:
   Just wondering if anyone has found a way to remove the tarnish off of older connectors.?? The tarnish is not effecting the usage, but does distract from the appearance.
     It they're silver, the visible silver oxide is a conductor so no need to do anything.      Removing the tarnish won't affect the signal so I wouldn't bother. Around here, the question is whether it makes a difference to the DX station. If it makes a difference - > Cheers,Steve     K7LXCTOWER TECH

This topic is actually quite controversial.  First of all, AFAIK,
"tarnish" is silver sulfide, not silver oxide.  Numerous
references say silver sulfide is NOT a good conductor,
even going to the extent of "debunking the myth" that it is.

When I worked for HP in atomic clock R&D, we discovered
that the silver plated microwave waveguides in our
model 5061B tarnished in areas where coal (containing
sulfur) was burned.  This would cause RF to leak out
of the waveguide and bounce around the chassis and
leak back in.  Removing the top cover (which should have
had no effect) would change the RF reflections.
For complicated reasons, this resulted in a frequency shift of the standard, which was called the "top cover effect."

The fix for this was to disassemble all the waveguide
pieces, clean up the tarnished surfaces, and then
reassemble everything.

I made sure to eliminate any silver plating and
replace it with gold plating in the model 5071A,
which replaced the 5061B.

Unfortunately, I don't remember what was used to
remove the tarnish, but you might be able to find
out by reading papers about the top cover effect written
by an Italian professor named de Marchi.

Rick N6RK

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>