Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Cushcraft/MFJ Traps

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Cushcraft/MFJ Traps
From: Don <w7wll@arrl.net>
Reply-to: w7wll@arrl.net
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 10:04:40 -0700
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
My in the air TH7DX was purchased in 1983 if I recall correctly, not to long after it was introduced in '82(?). I also have a second which purchased out of an estate type sale that was up for a period of time.

I had zero problems with the antenna or antenna traps until I moved to the coast and found myself looking down on the ocean some hundreds of feet away. Mucho salt spray and air. Common steel frame lawn chairs/tables and common plated steel hardware rust out in less than two seasons. I now know every nearby store who carries SS hardware now.

Two years ago I began having 15 and 20 M SWR problems. I was able to isolate the issues to the traps. I removed and cleaned up the15 M and 10 M traps in DE 1 and the R which at the time was diagnosed as the problem area. Found the screws used to fasten the two ends of the coil to the element tubing were common cheap plated thread tapping screws and were corroded to the extent that little was left of the screws in a couple of cases. After removing the screws and cleaning up the surfaces, I replaced with SS screws using an antiseize compound my electrician uses for an interface between aluminum and SS. Rechecked after back up and this cleanup had solved the problem. Now I am seeing some SWR issues again on 15 and 20 so suspect I will have to do the same cleanup of the DE2 and also the D (yes, should have done them all at the same time, was in a hurry, bad decision). Will also check the matching assy. I have not seen any problem with the coil forms or with arcing in the coils and I do run the full legal limit when necessary.

Summary, I'd bet the most common problem with a TH7 trap is the screws used in the traps failing. Might take longer for them to corrode in non salt air areas but they will. I've got pictures of the trap interiors and the screws in the traps before rework I'd be glad to share, ugly! I did replace the plastic end caps with new ones from MFJ when reassembling, almost all the originals were split. These traps are easy to work on and I'd sure suggest any time someone has a TH7 down for any reason to do an examination of the traps. Check out the screw holding the aluminum trap cover too, also had to replace them.

Don T W7WLL

On 9/12/2019 3:07 PM, K9MA wrote:
Since MFJ also owns Hy-Gain, it wouldn't surprise me if they were using a common trap design. If so, I'd suspect the Hy-Gain traps would have the same issues. Has anyone seen the insides of one?

I can't tell what kind of material they're using for the coil form. Two of the MFJ traps are currently on my A3, but I think I'll put the originals back.



73,
Scott K9MA

On 9/12/2019 16:54, Glenn Pritchard wrote:
Scott,
That looks a lot like the Hy-Gain trap design they used years ago that MFJ is now using. They had that plastic trap form that cracked easily under pressure. I had an old 18AVT that used those, meh.
Why on earth they went cheap is beyond anyones guess.

Glenn, VA7UO

On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 2:44 PM K9MA <k9ma@sdellington.us <mailto:k9ma@sdellington.us>> wrote:

    Here are links to photos of the A3 TC 15m trap, the original
    Cushcraft
    version circa 1992 and the recent MFJ one:

    sdellington.us/hr/TC_CC1.jpg <http://sdellington.us/hr/TC_CC1.jpg>

    sdellington.us/hr/TC_MFJ1.jpg <http://sdellington.us/hr/TC_MFJ1.jpg>

    Note the two pop rivets in the CC trap, missing from the MFJ one.
    There
    are two more rivets on the other side. The extra screw in the CC
    trap is
    one I added.  Note also that the wire on one end of the MFJ coil is
    wrapped the wrong way. Originally, both terminations looked much
    worse.
    Later, I wrapped both the right way, and added SS flat washers. I
    also
    fixed that almost shorted turn.

    The MFJ trap has 4 fewer turns than the CC trap, though the
    resonance is
    about the same. It looks like the MFJ coil form is slightly larger.

    I don't like to bash MFJ, as I think they provide a useful service to
    the ham radio community, but I do wish they paid more attention to
    QC,
    especially for antennas, installation of which involves a lot of work
    and expense.

    73,

    Scott K9MA


    On 9/12/2019 13:22, K9MA wrote:
    > I recently ordered some replacement traps for my old A3S. One was
    > defective, so I took it apart. I was appalled at the poor quality.
    > While the original traps had several pop rivets, in addition to the
    > coil screws, connecting the tubing to the plastic insulator, the
    MFJ
    > version had only the two screws in the very end of the tubing. The
    > coil wires were sometimes wrapped the wrong way around the
    screws, and
    > some of the screws weren't even tight. Where the original coil was
    > coated with some kind of thick lacquer, the MFJ ones were bare.
    >
    > The moral of the story is don't even think about going to the
    trouble
    > of putting up an MFJ/Cushcraft beam without taking apart all the
    traps
    > and fixing the above problems.
    >
    > 73,
    >
    > Scott K9MA
    >

    --     Scott  K9MA

    k9ma@sdellington.us <mailto:k9ma@sdellington.us>

    _______________________________________________



    _______________________________________________
    TowerTalk mailing list
    TowerTalk@contesting.com <mailto:TowerTalk@contesting.com>
    http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk



--
/Never believe and Atom, they make up everything../



_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>