Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Opening Steel Hardwre AFter 15 Years

To: towertalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Opening Steel Hardwre AFter 15 Years
From: Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 15:49:07 -0400
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
On 04/15/20 15:16 PM, jimlux wrote:

For a few dollars, safety wires seem to me to be a good value insurance, but YMMV for risk taking.

Absolutely. I was only gently correcting the common notion that turnbuckle safety wires are to keep a tower from falling if the turnbuckle *breaks*.

Which it (the safety wire) certainly will NOT do unless it's installed way differently than is common practice.

For that, I've seen a short cable with crimped loops on the end, or a big loop, that's connected "in parallel" with the turnbuckle (not through the turnbuckle eyes, but through the loops that mate with the turnbuckle eyes.  I can't say that it would save anything, but maybe it would.  You've got all the "small radius bend" problems.

It might be purely a psychological crutch.

Yes, it would take a safety loop using the same termination methods as the guy wire itself. Eyes (with 3 cable clamps each) at each end of the the loop, hooked together with a shackle, or something like that. At least then the "safety wire" would have a chance at surviving the shock load of a turnbuckle failure.

The normal way of having the wire wound thru the TB with the 2 ends connected together in parallel with a single clamp, which is how it's generally done in the commercial world, is obviously meant for other purposes.

-Steve K8LX

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>