Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Tying 80 and 160m radials

To: "'Ignacy Misztal'" <no9e@arrl.net>, <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Tying 80 and 160m radials
From: "Tim Duffy" <k3lr@k3lr.com>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 09:52:37 -0400
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Hello Ignacy:

Strongly connected is the answer. When it comes to radials - more is always
better.

73
Tim K3LR

-----Original Message-----
From: TowerTalk [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
Ignacy Misztal
Sent: Monday, May 25, 2020 9:18 AM
To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: [TowerTalk] Tying 80 and 160m radials

A tower is shunt fed for 160m and will be used to support 4 sq for 80m. A
question is whether the radials systems for 160m and 80m should be
strongly connected, weakly connected or disconnected.

AC0C has 160m radials buried and 80m radials on top of grass. They seem to
be disconnected. He has a good signal.

ON4UN writes that mesh for both bands is OK and also that a single elevated
radial for 80m over 160m radials works very well. He has a good signal.

If 80m radials are connected in the middle as recommended for DXE 4 sq,
that connection ties into 160m radials in the center.

One answer is it does not matter as long as there are sufficient number of
radials. Any practical experience?

Ignacy, NO9E
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>