| To: | towertalk@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] Moving ham radio eflectors to permit attachments |
| From: | Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com> |
| Reply-to: | jim@audiosystemsgroup.com |
| Date: | Tue, 21 Dec 2021 20:52:01 -0800 |
| List-post: | <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
On 12/21/2021 8:33 PM, Tim Duffy wrote: I am trying to understand what is wrong with the current reflector format? 2000 users and working great - why mess with success? I strongly agree. If you need to post an attachment - make it a link and all goes well. That's easy for you, me, and others with a website, but not so easy for most other members. Towertalk is not broken - just one opinion. I too like it just the way it is. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Moving ham radio eflectors to permit attachments, Tim Duffy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Moving ham radio eflectors to permit attachments, Gary K9GS |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Moving ham radio eflectors to permit attachments, Tim Duffy |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Moving ham radio eflectors to permit attachments, Michael Tope |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |