Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Johnson Matchbox Question - Ten Tec 228/229

To: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Johnson Matchbox Question - Ten Tec 228/229
From: Edward Mccann via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Edward Mccann <edwmccann@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2022 07:48:57 -0700
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Interesting trip down memory lane re EFJ.

Internet posts elsewhere show back in the day then-available Annecke tuners 
best the Matchbox; various mods suggested. Unfortunately, suggestions present 
minimal proof of results, however, probably due to determining “performance” 
actually dependent on the aerial used and environment.

It seems the manufacturing rage that followed in the search for tuners offering 
solutions for “balanced”
antennas led OEMs to inclusion of baluns in the output circuit. Most of them 
appear to be voltage baluns as opposed to 1:1 current baluns, apparently 
chasing the notion that a 4:1 transformation at the back of the box made an 
efficient hook-up to twinlead or ladder line at the shack wall, without 
consideration of Z shack not necessarily Zo.

Another website has recently tried ti evaluate the balun of the then-popular 
Heathkit 2040/2060 series, with the observation they used a ferrite transformer 
design.

Does anyone have any accurate observations on the characterization of Ten Tec 
228/229 tuner baluns? Would be interesting to know.

Best from the West,

Ed McCann
AG6CX


Sent from my iPhone

> On Mar 14, 2022, at 4:13 AM, Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> The "link" (that's the larger outer coil) originally had two taps.
> One just one or two turns from the grounded end.  That was the 50 ohm
> unbalanced input.  A second tap was a  few turns over from that.  It
> was for 300 ohm receiving line.  A lot of receivers had terminal
> strips on their back panels for the option of 300 ohm twin lead
> balance line for receiving, in the 1950s and '60s.   A Matchbox that
> doesn't have the link has been extremely modified into something else.
> It can no longer be a link coupled balanced line network.  Which
> brings me to a question:  Are you using your Matchbox for coax, or
> ladder line to your antenna?
> 
> I have one in regular use here with ladder line and a dipole.  It will
> be easier to determine what's going on with it if you get it out of
> its cover and run it in the open so you can see what's going on WRT
> capacitor meshing.  Just unscrew the zillion screws and put the knobs
> back on and connect the feedlines back up and you'll be able to see if
> you are running out of capacitance, or don't have enough etc.
> 
> 73
> Rob
> K5UJ
> _______________________________________________
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>