Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna wire source?

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna wire source?
From: "Lux, Jim" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2023 10:04:14 -0700
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
On 9/27/23 11:43 PM, Jim Pruitt wrote:
Hello Jim.

Your experience with Flexweave does not match my experience.  I had an inverted vee up using flexweave and it was up for 8 years until I took it down and we do get some hellacious winds here in the PNW.

I was and am looking for the surplus military type wire more for portable operations and that is why it is #22 or so.  Someone suggested that it is copperweld wire that I am looking for.  I certainly hope not as I will never use that stuff again!

Thank you.

Jim Pruitt
WA7DUY


On 9/27/2023 11:02 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
On 9/27/2023 9:52 PM, Jim Pruitt wrote:
I wonder if anyone can tell me what the wire is called that were used in several military surplus wire antennas. It was like flexweave but was a bronze copper wire (I thought) and about #22awg or so.

Don't know about that, but for almost 20 years, I've been buying the 500 ft spools of #8 bare copper from the big box stores, and stretching it to approximate #9 hard drawn copper.

I tried several configurations of Flex Weave about 20 years ago, and built several antennas with it. All were on the ground within a year. Another OT ham bought some and had the same results.

73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________


If you're looking for strong and flexible, what about stainless steel aircraft cable?  Sure, you'll lose a bit from increased resistance, but maybe it's small enough to not matter.  'DUY is looking at AWG22, so it's already kind of lossy.

To be honest, I don't know if you can get SS flex cable that small - AWG 22 is 0.025" (1/40th) inch.  I've seen1/32nd. (0.03125") type 304.  (hey, Grainger has 27/1000 diameter, that's pretty close - and they have 0.021, which is even smaller.)

SS 304 is about 2.5 times more resistive than Copper, but if we neglect permeability (Is 304 non-magnetic?) the skin depth is twice what it is in copper (at 10 MHz, 1.6 mil vs 0.8 mil), so the actual resistance is about the same.


304 ss is normally non-magnetic (mu of 1.005 or something like that) - but that might be an annealed piece.  Cold working (i.e. drawing into wire) can change the crystalline structure and make it magnetic, and if the mu goes up, then the skin depth gets thinner, so the resistance would rise.  That's also measured at DC - the permeability could be significantly different at HF.




Or, just use AWG 22 stranded, insulated copper, and let it wear out and fail (it's cheap).

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>