Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] re; STEPPir ANTENNAs

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] re; STEPPir ANTENNAs
From: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: jim@audiosystemsgroup.com
Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2025 20:41:57 -0700
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
I think the message here is that stacking is more complicated than it looks, and best results are likely obtained by very careful and extensive modeling. And also that thanks to the variability of propagation, stacking dimensions don't need to be "ideal" to be useful.

To understand this a bit better, here's my comment to Mike's use of "in phase" and "out of phase." This is a VERY important concept for us to understand.

On 4/6/2025 7:50 PM, Mike Fatchett W0MU wrote:
> The models most used had the stacking distance at 30 to 32 ft.  It was a
> compromise.   Most serious contesters had switches allowing upper, lower
> both, in and out of phase.
Phase is a continuously valued function and is measured in degrees or radians. It is also a function of time. Phase has no meaning for signals of different frequencies. The correct word for what hams have traditionally called "in phase" and "out of phase" is "polarity." The polarity of a system is either "normal" or "inverse." It's equivalent to reversing a pair of wires, or of passing a signal through an inverting stage. It can NOT be accomplished by any delay network, whether circuitry or transmission line. The vertical directivity of a vertical stack is the direct result of the phase difference between signals radiated from the stacked antennas being a direct function of the difference in time that the two have traveled to reach an observer over a higher or lower path, and of phase being a continuous variable AND a function of time.

These fundamentals are WHY stacking relationships between identical multiband antennas is so complicated. And it's why the design of broadband antennas is so complex.

A story from my youth. I lived 2-3 miles from a 4-tower AM on 930 kHz that was non-directional daytime, and with a complex pattern at night. The pattern was carefully designed by a consulting engineer to produce strong nulls in the directions of stations already licensed on the same and adjacent channels when this station was licensed, to protect them from interference. As I drove through those nulls, I heard distortion increase as I approached it, the carrier cancel at the null, and reverse the transition on the other side. All of this occurred within a few hundred feet. Again, because phase relationships in the signal received by the radio in my '57 Chevy were changing with distance. BTW -- as a young EE student, I later worked for that station, and also for a consulting engineer who designed arrays like that.

73, Jim K9YC

On 4/6/2025 7:58 PM, David Gilbert wrote:
Stacked yagis are only optimized at one frequency, but they are pretty tolerant of that spacing.  LOTS of hams have stacked multi-band tribanders and they do have worthwhile additional gain on all three bands.  If positioned at the right height they also have the advantage of at least partially filling in the nulls that would otherwise exist with a single antenna.

You can verify all of what I just wrote with a modeling program like EZNEC.


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>