Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Raised Radial Spacing

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Raised Radial Spacing
From: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: jim@audiosystemsgroup.com
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 11:40:01 -0700
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
On 10/28/2025 7:15 AM, john@kk9a.com wrote:
Back when N6BT owned Force12 they manufactured Sigma vertical dipoles.  It
was a sideways H shape fed in the middle and it had handmade wire inductors
to reduce the length.  I always thought that was a pretty good antenna for
its size and ease of installation.

Tom has done a lot with loaded vertical dipoles. It's a very interesting concept. W6GJB has built some that we've jointly designed, based on his ideas. One of them, for 80M CQP and 7QP county expeditions, worked quite well, but got destroyed in the wind because the Spiderbeam pole we used wasn't built the way the vendor said it was, and didn't have the mechanical strength they claimed. Glen is a fine mechanical engineer, retired from the space program.

In extensive RBN testing, it outperformed an inverted vee with an apex at 50 ft by more than 6 dB.

73, Jim K9YC

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>