Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Static Drain Resistor in Arrestor

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Static Drain Resistor in Arrestor
From: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2025 10:24:40 -0700
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
I think you confuse static (not moving) charge with QRN, natural and/or man made.  The drain resistor is not a noise blanker.

Wes  N7WS


On 12/16/2025 10:07 AM, RVZ via TowerTalk wrote:
I love the idea of a "Static Drain Resistor" in an arrestor if it actually reduces "static" QRN on receive.  I've installed about 
a dozen ICE/Morgan arrestors on Verticals and Yagi's here in Florida during the past 25 years, where we receive a great deal of "static", but 
when doing unscientific A/B tests when listening by ear, I haven't noticed the ICE/Morgan arrestor to be quieter than a Polyphasor.  I realize that's 
a poor way to judge performance, so I've always wondered if anyone actually measured and confirmed that the "static drain resistor" in the 
ICE/Morgan was effective at reducing QRN.  Would anyone know of test results confirming the effectiveness of a static drain resistor in an 
arrestor?     73, Dick- K9OM
The ICE, now Morgan arrestors work superb. They use a static drain resistor, 
then a DC blocking cap, then the shunt inductor, then the GDT.
_______________________________________________


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>