Hi, Brian.
Yeah, I almost always use the phrase "effective ground plane" when I
talk about this stuff but I didn't there. Also, I know that it's
actually a spatially distributed effect, but that gets even clumsier to
say each time ;)
I know that you've done a ton of really good work on ground conductivity
and ground effects and as you say I am no doubt seeing some very complex
effects given the ground conditions I have here ... very dry soil on
top, probably more moist soil down deep, and composition that ranges
from sand and fine particles to rocks the size of a bus at varying
depths. I have a drone that I have once or twice used to plot the
elevation pattern of an antenna (it works surprisingly well), and I may
some day model a couple of antennas and compare their actual measured
elevation plots (using the drone) to see what I really have and how much
that varies across my lot.
Lots of cool stuff to do ...
73,
Dave AB7E
On 4/15/2026 6:16 PM, Brian Beezley wrote:
AB7E said:
"Keep in mind that the RF ground plane is almost certainly not at the
surface of the physical ground."
Dave, the notion of a ground plane makes sense for perfectly
conducting ground. And it's not far off for seawater. But for other
types of ground, it can be misleading.
Electrical ground is right where you see it. But it's only part of the
story. For generic desert soil like yours, skin depth is 157 feet at
14.2 MHz and 533 feet at 1.8 MHz. That's where antenna-induced ground
current has decayed to 37% of its surface value. It's still 13.5% at
two skin depths. A lot can change over such distances, especially
moisture content, which greatly affects ground permittivity and
conductivity.
For any type of soil, the Fresnel reflection coefficient is nonzero at
the air/ground interface. Some signal reflection occurs there. For
low-loss soil like yours, significant reflection also may occur at
deeper soil layers. An upward-going signal reflected from a deep
stratified layer may get re-reflected at the surface. It can bounce
back and forth within the layer, dissipating power as it travels. This
effect can occur at multiple layers. Each upward-going signal that
reaches the surface transmits some power into the air. The result can
be quite complex. A mathematical treatment is here:
https://msp.org/memocs/2016/4-2/memocs-v4-n2-p03-p.pdf
Some of your inconsistent phase results may stem from subsurface
reflections with long path lengths. Unwrapping phase may help.
A fascinating effect is the resonance that can occur for low-loss soil
when the distance between subsoil layers is near a multiple of a
half-wavelength. I calculated that a sandy aquifer 66 feet below a
desert surface (a half-wavelength in ground) can increase effective
surface conductivity by a factor of 30 at 3.7 MHz. I suspect such
effects seldom occurs in practice because everything has to be just
right. You can download a calculator to explore resonance and other
stratified ground effects for two soil layers here:
https://k6sti.neocities.org/sg
Subsurface soil can affect both antenna impedance and far-field
patterns. NEC models uniform soil only. Its results may not be
realistic at your QTH because of the large exposure to subsurface
effects for desert soil.
Brian
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|