1. I would add either 222 or 1296, depending on activity and rarity of my
own grid; either can be done for $500-600
2. I would add 222 & 1296, then 2.304 &10 GHz., then back fill with 3.456
GHz. & 5.7 GHz. Money being no object, do the best possible job the first
time around.
At 11:09 AM 10/2/2002 -0700, John Geiger wrote:
>I am interested in receiving comments on the following for my own
>interest, as well as for a possible VHF club newsletter item.
>
>If you were currently active on the "Big 3" VHF/UHF bands (6, 2, 70cm)
>running 100 watts on each band with moderate sized antennas-13 elements on
>2 and 16 elements on 432, what band would you add next:
>
>1. If you were limited to $500-$600 for equipment and antennas
>2. If money and space were no object.
>
>Or, would you be better off using the money to improve your existing setup
>and just staying on 6, 2 and 432?
>
>73s John NE0P
|