VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] Rover Circling Solution [was: ARRL VHF+contestpropo

To: <VHFcontesting@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] Rover Circling Solution [was: ARRL VHF+contestproposal...
From: "Ron Hooper" <w4wa@alltel.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 10:35:53 -0500
List-post: <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Applying a reasonable time limit before returning to the same grid would
make grid circling difficult and still allow Jim's scenario to work as well.

Ron W4WA

-----Original Message-----
From: Jimk8mr@aol.com <Jimk8mr@aol.com>
To: w2ev@arrl.net <w2ev@arrl.net>; VHFcontesting@contesting.com
<VHFcontesting@contesting.com>
Date: Friday, February 20, 2004 8:22 PM
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] Rover Circling Solution [was: ARRL VHF+
contestproposal...


>In a message dated 2/20/2004 8:08:35 PM Eastern Standard Time,
w2ev@arrl.net
>writes:
>
>"Once operation has ceased, the same grid may not be re-activated by the
>same moving station in the same contest.  Operation in a previous grid
>is considered 'ceased' as soon as a single contact is made from a new
grid."
>
>No ambiguity.  Easily understood.  Easily policed.
>
>Stupid idea.
>
>What's wrong if I drive down the freeway a few hundred miles, maybe stop
and
>do something else, then drive back the same route?   So I can't work guys
on
>the way home?
>
>
>73   -   Jim   K8MR
>_______________________________________________
>VHFcontesting mailing list
>VHFcontesting@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
>

_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>