--- Bob K0NR <k0nr-list@rwitte.com> wrote:
> I'd suggest making this category "any three bands" to avoid
> arbitrarily locking out 222 MHz (or any other band for that matter).
> Certainly, the IC-706/FT-100/etc folks will choose 50-144-432 MHz
> anyway. Is there a downside to this approach?
Mike wrote
There's a number of FT-736 owners out there, I am one of them, and I just
recently picked up a 222
module for it, *_AND_* I just got a KB5KQ loop so don't write off 222.
Now why doesn't everyone take a stab at the big three, Kenwood, Yaesu & ICOM
and ask them where
there support of building more radios with 222 in them. Or they waiting for
the FCC to auction
that off too so they can sell more LMR radios than amateur radios.
Sorry I digress.
Mike
www.ka5cvh.com
=====
Mike Urich, KA5CVH
Amateur radio ~IS~ a contact sport!
http://www.ka5cvh.com
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard - Read only the mail you want.
http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|