> Good point. I knew it was complicated but I missed the asymmetry...
> A rover would need to know what the other rover had done in terms
> of grid movement to determine if an additional QSO would be
> valid, which is problematic.
>
Not necessarily. Just give the problem Rover a zero pointer for the QSO.
No harm, no foul.
Dan Evans K9ZF
Scottsburg, IN 47170
{EM78}
K9ZF /R no budget Rover
ex-N9RLA
Check out the Rover Resource Page at:
http://www.qsl.net/n9rla
QRP-l #1269
Central States VHF Society
IN-Ham list administrator
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob K0NR" <k0nr-list@rwitte.com>
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|