On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 09:09:45PM -0400, Bill Burgess wrote:
> Either the "Great American Way" is backwards, making you guilty on accusation
> until you can prove your innocence, or a few here have it all backwards, for
> I still am seeing this same old "make those we accuse prove their innocence."
>
> Any American lawyers reading this?
This is not a court of law - it is a public debate about an issue.
Again, if you want to see a grid circling "captive" rover - please look
over this log:
http://www.kkn.net/~k5tr/logs/n6zz-Jan-2005.log
Has W2SZ (or someone representing them) come forward to say they do not use
(or never did use) captive rovers?
Again - except for the nearly impossible to prove rule - they aren't
illegal.
It sounds like W2SZ has encouraged rovers to work other stations so they
aren't captive. I think it is great that W2SZ is doing this.
Tree
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|