On Sun, 4 Sep 2005 w0eea@sbbco.net wrote:
> Therefore after rereading the rules, the conclusion is
> inescapable that
> a rules wording change would be required to prevent family operation in
> rovers, not just
> a clarification of the rules from headquarters. Therefore the current
> policy of allowing
> such operations mentioned by Mark and Tom is the correct one, and if the
> League desires
> to prohibit such operation in the future they need to _change the rules_.
>
> 73,
>
> Jim
>
I seem to recall this question coming up before. It may have had to do
with the K0PG/N9ILT family roving team in my area. At any rate, I seem to
recall an ARRL contest official making a statement that they had
interpreted the rule regarding family roving correctly and it was OK.
73, Zack W9SZ
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|