I don't know John but I started with 30 ft, then 40 ft, 50 ft and now 70 ft
and each time it got better.
David
KE4YYD
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Geiger" <johngeig@yahoo.com>
To: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>; <vhf@w6yx.stanford.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 1:43 PM
Subject: [VHFcontesting] Optium antenna height
> Another local VHFer and myself were having a
> discussion as I was driving to work today about
> antenna height for VHF. One thing we wondered about
> is if there is an "optium" antenna height for VHF, or
> is "higher always better." Is there a point where the
> extra height isn't worth the cost of tower, coax, etc,
> and the extra loss in the coax-in terms of the
> increased distance you will work? Or does extra
> height always outweight these other factors?
>
> 73s John W5TD
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Want to start your own business?
> Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business.
> http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/r-index
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.14.19/556 - Release Date:
> 11/28/2006
>
>
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|