Re: [VHFcontesting] CQ WW VHF Rule question

["John (JK) Kalenowsky, K9JK" <k9jk73@msn.com>]

On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 15:24:01 -0700, Kenny K2KW wrote:
> This rule has been in the CQWW HF rules for some time.  The intent was to 
> stop people from using remote receivers or remote stations in ADDITION to 
> their main station.

IF that IS the "intent", iIt seems that it might be BETTER accomplished if 
the prior sentence was worded:

Transmitters, receivers AND ANTENNAS
must be located within a 500 meter
diameter circle or within the property limits
of the station licensee?s address, whichever
is greater.

Then that second sentence that Dex asked about wouldn't be needed.

OR, if I interpret that the way it is...does THIS allow me to run "wire" 
from a transmitter/receiver at my station to antennas on the east and west 
coast (or outside of that "500 meter/property limits" clause anyway)?

Or am >I< still missing something? Other thoughts?

73, JK


> 73, Kenny K2KW
>
>
>
> ---- Dexter McIntyre W4DEX <dmcintyre@att.net> wrote:
> > I need some help understanding this part of the rules in
> > Section IV.
> >
> > "All antennas used by the entrant
> > must be physically connected by wires to the
> > transmitters and receivers used by the
> > entrant"
> >
> > From:  http://www.cqww-vhf.com/cqwwvhf_2007.pdf
> >
> > W4DEX
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > VHFcontesting mailing list
> > VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
>
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting


_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting