VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] "Rule" 1.10 revisited

To: Bill Burgess <ve3cru@rac.ca>, vhfcontesting@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] "Rule" 1.10 revisited
From: John Geiger <n5ten@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 13:43:53 -0800 (PST)
List-post: <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Also, they never say where the communication has to
take place.  Communicating over a 1km distance is much
easier in free space than on the earth.

73s John AA5JG

--- Bill Burgess <ve3cru@rac.ca> wrote:

> As printed, what we see posted as Rule 1.10 is not
> really a rule, and not worthy of the paper or space
> it takes up.  As a proofreader, I read every word as
> printed, not as others choose to interpret it.
> 
> Accordingly, "equipment SHOULD be capable of" is a
> suggestion, not a rule.  If it were a rule, it would
> have to read "equipment MUST be capable of".  As
> explained to me by another ARRL official whose email
> I am still searching for, "operators need not prove
> this in advance, they can operate in the contest
> regardless".  So in actual fact, one never needs to
> prove this as nobody will ever call on you to prove
> it.
> 
> As all have noted, there is no defined distance
> established in the January - June - September
> contests.  This I understand is because the ARRL
> committe could find no acceptable way of measuring
> contest qso's by the exchange given.  To impose a 6
> km distance would require a 6 digit grid reference
> from both parties and still have ambiguity in it.  
> 
> Due to the "no minimum distance", statement, even
> laser qso's of 3 inches to a foot are acceptable. 
> Not my idea of clean contesting, though totally
> legal.  From a safety standpoint, laser
> "micro-qso's" may prevent serious eye problems from
> misdirected laser beams.  But as lasers are not true
> RF, I think they should be dropped from contesting,
> to encourage more activity on lower bands to gain
> the points.  More would win points by doing so.
> 
> In rereading the stated Rule 1.10, does anybody else
> read it as I interpret it?
> 
> 73,
> 
> Bill  Burgess   VE3CRU  
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
>
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
> 



      
____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>