VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] 6M Dominant

To: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] 6M Dominant
From: jon jones <n0jk@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 21:15:04 +0000
List-post: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
6 is not always dominant...
 
How quickly people forget. Last year 6 Meters stank - one of the worst
June contests for Es. We were blessed with good 6M conditions this year.
 
The ARRL has the UHF contest and 10 GHz contest focusing on
UHF/microwave & microwave bands. The September and January contests
don't have much Es usually so they are 2 Meters and above by default.
That leaves the June VHF QSO Party as the only ARRL VHF Contest
with widespread 6 Meter activity. And that will vary depending if there
is E-skip or not.
 
The multi-ops don't ignore the higher bands, even when 6 is open.
 
I would encourage those who are interested in 222 MHz and up to 
give the ARRL UHF Contest a try and submit a log this year. 
 
 - N0JK>I try and stay out of the "Rules Game" and any blogs about our 
contesting >aliments but I must agree with KR1ST, Chris, who suggests removing 
6m from >the ARRL VHF/UHF contest. My suggestion is not to eliminate all 6m 
ARRL >contesting but maybe one or two especially during the June contest. Let's 
>give the upper bands more attention, that is where we need to focus. 6m is a 
>fun band but as Chris mentioned, it is in every radio and the bands get 
>clogged with non-contesters. Maybe a 6m only contest is a good way for them 
>to get inoculated to move up. I found myself trapped on 6m lurking for the 
>next new grid and forgetting 2m-2304 during long periods of band openings 
>when the multipliers are upper bands.>73's>Steve
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>