VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] Rovers

To: vhfcontesting@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] Rovers
From: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Reply-to: w2ev@yahoo.com
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 12:48:41 -0800 (PST)
List-post: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
--- On Mon, 12/8/08, Tom Carney <tomc@carneysugai.com> wrote:
>> "Rover-to-Rover QSO's do not count for contest
>> credit."  That would certainly encourage rovers
>> to create stations that are equipped to make QSO's over
>> greater distances and with other stations.
> 
> This rule change would certainly encourage this rover to
> just stay home.
-------------------------------------------------------------

You've been known to operate from all around San Francisco: CM96 Fremont Peak, 
CM97 Mt. Hamilton, CM86 Santa Cruz and CM87 Skyline near Palo Alto on ABCD.  I 
would think that you would instead, increase ERP or add a band or three to 
reach even more population.

Why would you just stay home?

Ev, W2EV


      
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>