VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

[VHFcontesting] CQ to accept eQSL for award credit

To: "VHF Contesting Reflector" <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>, <vhf@w6yx.stanford.edu>
Subject: [VHFcontesting] CQ to accept eQSL for award credit
From: "Les Rayburn" <les@highnoonfilm.com>
Reply-to: Les Rayburn <les@highnoonfilm.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 00:45:21 -0600
List-post: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
http://www.eham.net/articles/20825

According to Eham, QRZ, DX News, and numerous other sources, CQ Magazine will 
begin accepting eQSL (www.eqsl.cc) confirmations for their awards programs. 
This bold move certainly "ups the ante" for the ARRL and their LoTW program. 

While I've been an active user of Logbook of the World for several years now, 
I've also been disappointed with it in many ways. First and foremost is that it 
is currently only accepted for DXCC and Worked All States. It is not accepted 
for VUCC, and there is no timetable from the league on when this award and 
others might be added. 

The league has cited limited resources and complexity as the barrier to adding 
more awards to the program. I had hoped that the addition of Yaesu as a major 
sponsor of the program might accelerate progress, so far there has been no 
visible movement. 

Another criticism is that the security for LoTW is unnecessarily high, and 
these safeguards increase the complexity and making changing the software 
difficult and time consuming. Literally, I can log on to my bank and perform 
on-line banking with fewer safeguards than exist on LoTW. 

Those of us in corporate America see this mind-set all too often. The IT 
department staff lives in fear of viruses, cyber-attacks, and other threats, 
and management doesn't really understand the technology. The end result is that 
users are often handcuffed with a network that is too protective, with adverse 
effects on productivity. The league seems to have fallen into this trap as 
well. 

While they will accept virtually any printed card, or letter from another 
amateur as proof of a QSL, I cannot receive a JPEG image by computer and print 
it out. "Card checkers" have widely varying standards, and the whole system 
ignores the modern age of communications. 

I'm no huge fan of eqsl's system either, but it does seem a more reasonable 
compromise between the legitimate need for security and validation and ease of 
use. As postal costs continue to rise, and the economy suffers, the sheer cost 
of achieving awards like VUCC becomes a real issue for most of us. Even 
domestic postage can be daunting, and international rates far worse. 

I'd love to see the league publish a timeline for adding VUCC and other awards 
to LoTW as an immediate step. I'd also like to see them consider alternative 
systems like eQSL for award credit, perhaps for domestic awards like WAS. 
Reducing the security for the system could also speed adoption and popularity 
of the system. 

If VUCC credit were allowed, would other VHF operators use it or not? I get a 
lot of 6 Meter contacts being reported now on the system, but very few for 2 
Meters and up. 
Thoughts?

73,

Les Rayburn, N1LF
EM63nf
121 Mayfair Park
Maylene, AL 35114
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>