VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] Re: [WSVHF] [Mw] VUAC Seeks Input

To: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] Re: [WSVHF] [Mw] VUAC Seeks Input
From: Steve Clifford <k4gun.r@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 08:46:44 -0500
List-post: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
That is the EXACT same question the rovers have been asking about the CA
group.  We've been told to sit down and shut up.  We just live with those
who care nothing about fair play and competition.

Steve
K4GUN/R

On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com> wrote:

> What fun is that? Maybe it's possible, but if contesting comes to that, I
> won't do it. I LIKE to operate my radio myself and that's the main reason I
> contest.
>
> If someone is only doing contesting to rack up a score, I question why
> they're in this hobby.
>
> 73, Zack W9SZ
>
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 11:11 AM, William M. Pasternak <
> newsline@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
> > Here is one to ponder:  How about a station where a computer runs it --
> > without human intervention -- and racks up the needed contacts to qualify
> --
> > even if it does it while the control operator sirt across the room
> reading a
> > novel or watchging TV?  With the state of the art of todays processing
> power
> > thats available for a pittance, it is at least conceivable that someone
> --
> > some place -- is going to at least try to create a self operating station
> --
> > most likely a contest station -- just to prove it can be done.  -- de
> Bill
> > P.
>  ------
> Submissions:                    vhf@w6yx.stanford.edu
> Subscription/removal requests:  vhf-request@w6yx.stanford.edu
> Human list administrator:       vhf-approval@w6yx.stanford.edu
> List rules and information:     http://www-w6yx.stanford.edu/vhf/
>
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>