VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

[VHFcontesting] Time to Change VUCC Rules?

To: "VHF Contesting Reflector" <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>, <vhf@w6yx.stanford.edu>
Subject: [VHFcontesting] Time to Change VUCC Rules?
From: "Les Rayburn" <les@highnoonfilm.com>
Reply-to: Les Rayburn <les@highnoonfilm.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 21:18:29 -0600
List-post: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Considering the recent rules changes for ARRL VHF/UHF Contest regarding optical 
communications, isn’t it time to also change the VUCC Award credits to better 
reflect the current thinking (and state of the art for free space optical 
communications?)

Currently, the VUCC Rules define this frequency range as “Laser 300Ghz and 
above”. While the ARRL VHF/UHF Contest rules define these contacts as: 

Above 300 GHz, contacts are permitted for contest credit only between licensed 
amateurs using mono-chromatic signal sources (for example, laser and LED) and 
employing at least one stage of electronic detection on receive.  Laser usage 
is restricted to ANSI Z136 Class I, II, IIa, and IIIa (i.e.; output power is 
less than 5 mW).

A handful of amateurs are currently working to develop optical “transverters” 
that would work with IF rigs like the FT-817 and others on full-fledged 
transceivers that utilize one LED as both emitter and detector, which greatly 
simplifies mechanical design and aiming. It would be a shame to see these 
advances be ruled ineligible for VUCC credit. 

How about it, Newington? 

73,

Les Rayburn, N1LF
EM63nf

P.S. How do I order a VUCC lapel pin? I didn’t get one with my certificate, but 
I’d really like one. 
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>