Based on my experiences in the September contest (to be transparent I was
running an earlier version of the software) I share the concerns about sending
"/R"
My manual work around was complex for me to use, wouldn't work automatically
and seemed to confuse other users. I'm sad to see reports that this issue
still exists. (I also saw some comments along these lines on one of the chat
boards during the contest.)
73
Mark S
VE7AFZ
Mark Spencer
Aligned Solutions Co.
mark@alignedsolutions.com
604 762 4099
> On Jan 22, 2018, at 3:34 PM, Keith Morehouse <w9rm@calmesapartners.com> wrote:
>
> There are serious shortcomings in WSJT-X when used by a contest station
> that must sign /R.
>
> AC0RA found out all about them this weekend - things needs to be changed
> but, apparently the current keepers of the software don't think changes are
> necessary. This is 2nd hand info from someone who has been involved and
> should know.
>
> -W9RM
>
>
> Keith J Morehouse
> Managing Partner
> Calmesa Partners G.P.
> Olathe, CO
>
>> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 4:27 PM, Steve Stahl <ke7ihg@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Mark
>> I think Rover/Portable operators will lose out. FT8 works well but is
>> just one more thing to juggle in the rover rig. With the reduction in ssb
>> operations a guy would have to ask why would I spend my hard earned money
>> to rover when I can sit at home and run FT8 all day?
>>
>> Steve K7SWS
>>
>>
>>> On Jan 22, 2018 2:19 PM, "Mark Spencer" <mark@alignedsolutions.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> My observations during the recent September and January VHF contests
>> leave
>>> me with the impression that a number of operators in my region are
>> shifting
>>> at least some of their focus on 50 MHz to FT8. Given the performance I
>>> have seen from FT8 and my experience running that mode from my home
>> station
>>> with a self imposed 25 watt power limit and a temporally installed 3
>>> element yagi during the January contest I can see why it is quite popular
>>> for many operators.
>>>
>>> I did try to keep an eye on the band scope while running FT8 on 50.313
>> but
>>> didn't see much activity on 50.125
>>>
>>> 73
>>>
>>> Mark S
>>>
>>> VE7AFZ
>>> mark@alignedsolutions.com
>>> 604 762 4099
>>>
>>>>> On Jan 22, 2018, at 12:03 PM, George Sintchak <wa2vnv@optonline.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I know there is a lot of people thinking that FT8 will dominate
>>> activity. I don't see that happening during a contest when you are
>> running
>>> SSB or CW during an Es opening. FT8 takes too long to complete a contact
>>> compared to a normal fast paced SSB/CW run. Same for RTTY in HF contests
>> -
>>> a RTTY fast contact takes maybe 10 seconds to complete when using a
>>> computer run station with you at the keyboard - not typing on an old
>> model
>>> 15 or 28 TTY machine. (Anyone still use one? I've used both.)
>>>> In my experience with FT8 & MSK144, when conditions are normal(?) and
>>> activity is nil, FT8 contacts can be made where you normally can't make
>> it
>>> with conventional modes. The ~20+ dB advantage receiving into the noise
>>> (at both ends) is just better than the human ear. All that aside, it's
>> just
>>> some more of the fun and technology now available to us. (Flame suit on).
>>>>
>>>> 73, George WA2VNV (FN30 & EL96)
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Herb Krumich via VHFcontesting" <
>>> vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
>>>> To: "VHF Contesting" <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
>>>> Sent: Monday, January 22, 2018 10:20 AM
>>>> Subject: [VHFcontesting] How to order
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Does anyone know of a company that is manufacturing a six meter
>>> tranceiverthat is rock bound on 50.313Looks like in the future, there is
>> no
>>> need to tune the six meter band ?ThanksHerb K2LNSat WA2FGK FN21
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> VHFcontesting mailing list
>>>>> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> VHFcontesting mailing list
>>>> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> VHFcontesting mailing list
>>> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
>> _______________________________________________
>> VHFcontesting mailing list
>> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
>
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|