VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] Digital Modes (FT8) in January 2019 Contest

To: vhfcontesting@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] Digital Modes (FT8) in January 2019 Contest
From: Dave Clouser <dave@nz3m.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 18:59:11 -0400
List-post: <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Interesting how folks perceive digital comms as some sort of magical mode where you don't even need propagation.  Digital is a "sound" that is generated by your computer and sent through your transmitter, just like SSB or CW is through your mic or key.  That sound is received by your receiver and sent to the computer to be decoded, just like SSB is decoded by your brain when you hear it (thanks to English classes).  You need propagation just like the other modes.  Its just a language that we don't understand....YET :-)



On 6/19/2019 6:10 PM, David Huff wrote:
I agree with others, splitting the contest might be better.
Have 1 weekend be ONLY digital VHF/UHF
A second weekend being only VHF/UHF SSB/CW
And then a third weekend of VHF/UHF any mode.

Note, we have ARRL awards for HF split by mode, but not VHF/UHF, meaning there 
is no digital only VHF award.  They just lump everything together.  Looking at 
the grid chase stats, it is clear digital HF modes are more popular than HF 
CW/SSB for the HF bands.  But a lack of VHF/UHF radios that do SSB/CW/Digital 
as well as FM is probably to blame.

My personal theory, more people would be on VHF/UHF if the radios were more 
convenient to interface to a digital source like a laptop, and cheaper.  Right 
now there is a lack of affordable ALL mode style radios for VHF/UHF.  And the 
ones that do exist are expensive.

Thanks,
David
W0IM


_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting


_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>