Thanks Micheal.
Yes, I did receive your input and my plan is to simply make the download
you tested available from the web page.
I am aware that WL diddles more slowly than most programs. There were
some technical issues that I have now forgotten that caused me to
chose to slow it down. It wasn't what I wanted, but there were something
else I couldn't do with a fast diddle. But I don't remember what that was
right now.
Thanks,
Wayne
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael_Joens@Millipore.com <Michael_Joens@Millipore.com>
To: W. Wright, W5XD <w5xd@alum.MIT.EDU>
To: <writelog@contesting.com>
Date: Tuesday, June 08, 1999 2:39 PM
Subject: RE: [WL-USERS] FSK Stop Bit Setup
>
>
>Wayne,
>
>I just wanted to make sure that you have received my feedback on the fix
>you sent me, since I haven't heard from you. The on-air testing with George
>and general qso's went well. Measurements are great. George and I detected
>a minor issue (or non-issue) with the AFSK diddle being slower than most
>(FSK is perfect).
>
>No pressure to respond, just want to make sure you received my emails and
>that they were useful to you.
>
>Regards,
>
>Michael, K1JE
>
>
|