The following messages came direct to me in response to my question
about the lack of a CW sidetone in WL and I believe should be directed
at the reflector so all including the author of can see them.
Subject:
Re: [WriteLog] CW Sidetone
To: <writelog@contesting.com>
Date:
Wed, 19 Jul 2000 07:21:31 -0400 (EDT)
From:
N3ND@aol.com
To:
punkymcd@pacbell.net
Don:
I agree, a sidetone WriteLog generated is needed.
Dan -- N3ND
Subject:
Re: [WriteLog] CW Sidetone
To: <writelog@contesting.com>
Date:
Wed, 19 Jul 2000 12:30:45 +0200
From:
Engfer@t-online.de (Erhard Engfer)
To:
punkymcd@pacbell.net
References:
1 , 2
Hello Don,
I guess that "zilch response" has only one reason: It´s impossible yet !
Yes, I´m also missing that feature well known from CT.
73´s
Erhard, DL5JQ
Subject:
RE: [WriteLog] CW Sidetone
To: <writelog@contesting.com>
Date:
Wed, 19 Jul 2000 00:21:20 -0400
From:
Keith Regli <kregli@aspi.net>
To:
punkymcd@pacbell.net
Don,
I think most everyone figured this was more a request than a question.
At
this point WL won't generate a sidetone. I'd guess it is on Wayne's
list,
but the only way it moves up is if he gets lots of requests like yours.
Keith WB6BIG-
Subject:
Re: [WriteLog] CW Sidetone
To: <writelog@contesting.com>
Date:
Wed, 19 Jul 2000 01:46:56 +0000
From:
Steve Baron - KB3MM <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com>
To:
punkymcd@pacbell.net
References:
1 , 2
Perhaps an embarassing question ...
end
That's all that's come out of my question so far.
73, Don, W6OA
--
WWW: http://www.writelog.com/
Submissions: writelog@contesting.com
Administrative requests: writelog-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-writelog@contesting.com
|