Steve, I think you misunderstood. It's not that they aren't queued. If I
send just one, like in response to a repeat request, it hangs at the end of
the QTC, in diddle. However, if I click on another one during this hung
diddle, it goes on and sends the second one, haning at the end of it. I can
also click on 2 or 3 in quick succession, and they all go fine until it
hangs at the end of the last of the 3.
It just won't let go of the LAST one, whether that's the last of 1 or the
last of several.
BTW, WL handles hitting F-keys in quick succession just fine. I append 2
together frequently, and sometimes hit F11 twice for a double CQ. 73
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Baron - KB3MM" <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com>
To: "WA9ALS - John" <wa9als@starband.net>
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2001 7:10 PM
Subject: Re: [WriteLog] More on single QTC hang
> There are quite a few things that do not work right when two operations
are
> done in 'too quick' succession.
>
> Things in WL are apparently not queued.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "WA9ALS - John" <wa9als@starband.net>
> To: <Writelog@contesting.com>
> Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2001 23:40
> Subject: [WriteLog] More on single QTC hang
>
>
> > If I click on two QTCs in quick succession, it doesn't hang after the
> first
> > one, but it still does after the second one. When I click on only 1 and
> it
> > hangs at the end, if I click on another it will go ahead and do the %R
and
> > send the next one on the next line and then hang at the end of the 2nd
one
> > until I hit ESC.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > WriteLog mailing list
> > WriteLog@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
> >
> >
>
>
|