I also use RITTY with WL. Sometimes it seems to work well on weaker
signals and sometimes it doesn't. (No multipath or polar flutter.) I
have this feeling that if the audio level isn't right RITTY doesn't work
as well as it can. I have tried running it by itself in a DOS box and,
with audio levels adjusted appropriately using the settings available in
RITTY it was great. Under WL the ability to set RITTY parameters
doesn't seem to be there and the performance is far from great. i.e. if
the relatively weak signal were cw instead of RTTY it would be solid
copy as opposed to mostly garbage.
Do you RITTY users get good weak signal performance from RITTY when used
with WL?
Am I missing something?
73 de Jim Smith VE7FO
John Cashen wrote:
> During my shortened BARTG effort(I even missed XR0X, although I did
> hear his pileup) I took a little time to compare RITTY with MMTTY.
|