The reason professionals use imaging is faster recovery... and I have
encountered difficulties with it in the past when restoring to a different
drive geometry. NT4 was troublesome in this way... it can also be
"interesting" when dealing with multiple OS's on the same HD...
I would prefer one of the more conventional means of backup for a home
computer unless one is very comfortable with the technology.
> On Thu, 8 Jul 2004 12:12:29 -0000, Robert McGwier wrote:
>
> >Life is too short and I can afford a full raid disk, and excellent
> >back up, and a high quality UPS much more readily than I can afford
> >to lose exactly 1/10 of my life's work.
>
> _________________________________________________________
>
> I see you've been given some good suggestions on how to back up your
> data, but the method many IT professionals recommend has not been
> mentioned: drive imaging.
>
> > Bill, W6WRT
> QSLs via LoTW
>
> _______________________________________________
> WriteLog mailing list
> WriteLog@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
> WriteLog on the web: http://www.writelog.com/
_______________________________________________
WriteLog mailing list
WriteLog@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
WriteLog on the web: http://www.writelog.com/
|