WriteLog
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [WriteLog] Special Wish List Request

To: writelog@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [WriteLog] Special Wish List Request
From: Jim Smith <jimsmith@shaw.ca>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 02:27:57 -0800
List-post: <mailto:writelog@contesting.com>
Hi Eric,

Some comments on your request

"Trimmed down this still requires 136 character spaces, which won't work with the 82 character limitation.

%C<sp2.wav>%B<b4.wav><gl.wav>%B<cpy.wav><nr.wav><sp2.wav>%1<sp1.wav><b.wav><sp3.wav><me.wav><sp2.wav><sp1.wav><ck.wav><sp1.wav><sec.wav>"

This can be shortened a lot as follows

Establish a standard that all space files are of the form n.wav or nn.wav where n is the number of space elements. Your example is now 122 chars
%C<2.wav>%B<b4.wav><gl.wav>%B<cpy.wav><nr.wav><2.wav>%1<1.wav><b.wav><3.wav><me.wav><2.wav><1.wav><ck.wav><1.wav><sec.wav>


Get rid of the pse copy. This has no place in contesting as it just wastes everyone's time. Now 113 chars
%C<2.wav>%B<b4.wav><gl.wav>%B<nr.wav><2.wav>%1<1.wav><b.wav><3.wav><me.wav><2.wav><1.wav><ck.wav><1.wav><sec.wav>


A more difficult suggestion, in that it requires the user to know how to associate a file extension with an application, is to establish a standard that a .w file is associated with the same app as a .wav file. Now 85 chars
%C<2.w>%B<b4.w><gl.w>%B<nr.w><2.w>%1<1.w><b.w><3.w><me.w><2.w><1.w><ck.w><1.w><sec.w>


You could shave off another 3 chars by making the file names shorter and, therefore, harder to understand and debug. But, at least you could test it.

I don't know enough about WL to comment on the other characters.

I do understand that what you provided is only an example and that, for your purposes, it would be desireable to have the message memory size expanded. In particular, you want the .w(av) file names to be long enough to make it obvious what the content is. You might even want to tag each filename with the op who recorded it. e.g. CQK6VVA.w, CQVE7FO.w or, CQVVA.w, CQFO.w or whatever shortened monikers make sense at the time. I'm just trying to suggest that 136 chars may not be necessary.

I ran into the same issue with TRLog when I wanted to send long control character sequences to the MkV to simulate SO2R to the extent possible with one radio. The message memories weren't big enough. I wrote up a detailed explanation of how it was all supposed to work and how to do it (it was many pages long - I'll send it to you). Tree created a beta just for me and then, when I demonstrated that the idea actually worked, incorporated the expanded message memory size into all future releases to date.

73 de Jim Smith VE7FO

Eric Hilding wrote:

I'm bringing up the 82 character limitation issue again in the CW/RTTY/SSB Message area dialog box again for (IMHO) several important reasons.

One exchange I need to program requires 161 characters. Yes, I could possibly trim it down a bit, but for all this recent new WL capability to be most effective, having the ability to not have to resort to an separate .wav file "lookup list" or "interpretation list" necessitates being able to have a reasonable number of characters to ID the .wav files for fast re-adjusting if desired or necessary.

Here is an example of why I am requesting further enhancements to the incredible capabilities now in WL, which I believe will also be of benefit to others (if not now, down the line):

%C<spc2.wav>%B<qsob4.wav><glom.wav>%B<psecopy.wav><num.wav><spc2.wav>%1<spc1 .wav><b.wav><spc3.wav><mycall.wav><spc2.wav><spc1.wav><myck.wav><spc1.wav><m ysec.wav>

Trimmed down this still requires 136 character spaces, which won't work with the 82 character limitation.

%C<sp2.wav>%B<b4.wav><gl.wav>%B<cpy.wav><nr.wav><sp2.wav>%1<sp1.wav><b.wav>< sp3.wav><me.wav><sp2.wav><sp1.wav><ck.wav><sp1.wav><sec.wav>



_______________________________________________ WriteLog mailing list WriteLog@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog WriteLog on the web: http://www.writelog.com/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>