At 11:55 PM 6/8/2005, Marc Ressler wrote:
>Most of the Icom rigs need to have TRANSCEIVE OFF with WL. The problem is
>that they "babble" so much when it is on that the single wire xmt/rcv data
>line suffers from lots of collisions, and when WL tries to poll the rig,
>the request frequently gets clobbered, making it appear that updates are
>slow to infrequent. I've seen this with a 746, a 756-ProI, and a 756-ProII.
Marc, thanks for the clarification:
Writelog - ICOM transceive OFF
CT - ICOM transceive ON
73 - Jim AD1C
--
Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, North Chelmsford, MA 01863
USA +978-251-9933, <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>, http://www.ad1c.us
_______________________________________________
WriteLog mailing list
WriteLog@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
WriteLog on the web: http://www.writelog.com/
|