WriteLog
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [WriteLog] QTC's AFTER a contact

To: <writelog@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [WriteLog] QTC's AFTER a contact
From: "Wolf, DL6JZ" <dl6jz@t-online.de>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 21:04:49 -0000
List-post: <mailto:writelog@contesting.com>
Hi Phil,

I think this is not a good idea!!

Why don't you want to have a dupe in your log? There is no reason for that.
My opinion is: Better more dupes than less points!! There are no penalties
in the age of cabrillo.

You don't have to exchange and enter a serial number for that second QSO but
when you look at your log window then you see that there is a normal QSO
record first and then the QTCs follow. Please keep care that you will not
destroy your log.

73 + 55
Wolf, DL6JZ


-----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
Von: writelog-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:writelog-bounces@contesting.com]Im Auftrag von Phil Cooper
Gesendet: Dienstag, 15. November 2005 19:01
An: RTTY
Cc: Writelog
Betreff: [WriteLog] QTC's AFTER a contact


Hi all,

I saw a couple of comments about handling QTC's "later", and ending up with
a dupe.

Yes, if you enter the call into the call field, and then initiate the QTC
window, then when you press OK, it will enter the call and the QTC and give
you a dupe.
I had this once, as I wasn't paying attention, BUT, there is a solution, and
one that may not be documented!

To get over this, first enter the call you wish to exchange QTC's with, AND
THE wipe it from the call field.
Now, when you initiate the QTC window, it will use that call!

This way, you get the QTC's recorded, but not a dupe!

73 de Phil GU0SUP

_______________________________________________
WriteLog mailing list
WriteLog@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
WriteLog on the web:  http://www.writelog.com/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>