WriteLog
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [WriteLog] Receive problem with MMTTY plug-in

To: pfkski@vail.net,"'Gary Senesac AL9A'" <al9a@pobox.mtaonline.net>,"'Writelog Reflector'" <writelog@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [WriteLog] Receive problem with MMTTY plug-in
From: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2006 16:46:49 -0800
List-post: <mailto:writelog@contesting.com>
If you were to use two computers, side by side and fed with the same 
audio, one running the "stock" WriteLog and the other MMTTY, you 
would soon see the answer to your question. MMTTY copies crummy 
signals much better.

In fact, if you make similar comparisons between different software 
programs, TNCs and what have you, you will be surprised how much 
better some copy than others. My personal all time favorite for 
pulling them out of the mud is RITTY by K6STI. I have just ordered a 
HAL ST-8000 which may prove to be even better. I'm looking forward to 
making the comparison.

Bill, W6WRT


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

ORIGINAL MESSAGE:

At 03:34 PM 1/7/2006, Phil Krichbaum wrote:
>I know lots of people
>swear by MMTTY but I've never heard an explanation of why it is better than
>just using stock WL for RTTY. KISS principle!

_______________________________________________
WriteLog mailing list
WriteLog@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
WriteLog on the web:  http://www.writelog.com/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>