WriteLog
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [WriteLog] CW gibberish

To: <writelog@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [WriteLog] CW gibberish
From: "Charles Morrison" <cfmorris@bellsouth.net>
Reply-to: cfmorris@bellsouth.net
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 19:47:21 -0600
List-post: <writelog@contesting.com">mailto:writelog@contesting.com>
> From: Barry <w2up3@verizon.net>
> Subject: [WriteLog] CW gibberish
> To: WriteLog@contesting.com
> Message-ID: <49332C8B.7070407@verizon.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> 
> After operating the contest for about 30 minutes, I remembered why I
> used N1MM last year - every now and then, with no discernable pattern,
> the CW output turns into gibberish.  I'm using a Dell laptop (WinXP, 1
> gig RAM) with 2 USB to serial adapters - one for the radio control and
> one for CW.  It works fine with N1MM and is not due to RFI as it occurs
> even when not transmitting on the air.  Any ideas?
> Tnx,
> Barry W2UP
> 
> --
> 

Barry, I think we've already forgotten what Wayne posted just 4 days ago.
Get a WKUSB, you wont be sorry, it works better, allows for paddle input
interruption of the CW string, doesn't jitter, can be used for remote, is
fully supported, is cheap, is fun to build, etc.. anyway here it is again:

From: "Wayne, W5XD" <w5xd@writelog.com>
Subject: Re: [WriteLog] TS-570DG do I need an interface box for CW
To: <writelog@contesting.com>
Message-ID: <893A86E982B64B3F8DDCF798D9A05C6E@W5XDCP>
Content-Type: text/plain;       charset="us-ascii"

> To send CW with WL do I need some type of interface box between my rig 
> and computer that's running XP?

Yes, you'll need something. WriteLog has supported sending CW on the RTS
line of an RS-232 interface since its very early versions in the late 80's. 

But.....

I really don't like trying to support that any more. Sending CW that way
requires the OS to give WriteLog response times on the order of
1 msec, else your CW will be garbled. All Windows versions are actually
capable of this, but most of us have all kinds of "stuff" installed on our
machines now taking up cycles, so I would trust only the most PC savvy (or
those running the oldest machines with their original OS installed) to be
sure they actually have found and disabled all the drivers, virus checkers,
malware, browser plug-in's, etc. etc. etc. that compete for CPU cycles just
at the critical time that turns a dit into a dah. You might be surprised at
what kind of supposedly useful software can do this (network drivers, IDE
CDROM drivers, USB hub drivers, virus checkers, etc. etc. etc.)

There are a number of devices on the market that can do this (google
"winkey" for example). We used to sell one just for WriteLog, but the
MK-1100 is out of production now.

Wayne, W5XD

_______________________________________________
WriteLog mailing list
WriteLog@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
WriteLog on the web:  http://www.writelog.com/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [WriteLog] CW gibberish, Charles Morrison <=