WriteLog
[Top] [All Lists]

[WriteLog] FW: how many still upgrade WriteLog on Windows 95, 98, ME, o

To: "'Writelog user group'" <writelog@contesting.com>
Subject: [WriteLog] FW: how many still upgrade WriteLog on Windows 95, 98, ME, or NT?
From: "Hal Kennedy" <halken@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:26:14 -0500
List-post: <writelog@contesting.com">mailto:writelog@contesting.com>
Since I no longer have Wayne's email address Ill reply here.  I'm not
sure what "NT" means.  I run a five computer network in the ham shack -
all the computers run Windows 2000NT Professional.  Is that "NT?"

They all run great, they all have nice fast LPT ports and multiple COM
ports and they all run WRITELOG at high speed with zero glitches.  I
don't plan to EVER replace the OS I use for ham radio logging.  Every
ham radio related application I use, and I use a lot of them, run fine
on WIN 2000.

It would be a shame if WL won't run on my network in the future.  As a
big fan and supporter of WL over many years, non-operability with
Windows 2000 would probably send me to N1MM.

73, Hal
N4GG
   

_______________________________________________
WriteLog mailing list
WriteLog@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
WriteLog on the web:  http://www.writelog.com/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>