> Perhaps Joe could chime in and advise if this configuration is
> possible with the microHAM router and MKII.
microKEYER II already provides the ability to "echo mic" within
its hardware and the original microKEYER provided for microphone
bypass (audio routing "A"). Both designs are consistent with
Wayne's new paradigm with no changes and no need for a second
soundcard (assuming the soundcard used with the microKEYER has
separate mic and line inputs).
The hardware in microKEYER II is *NOT* compatible with the use
of a second sound card as there is obviously no provision to
connect an audio feed from microKEYER II to a second sound card
or connect the output of a second sound card to microKEYER II.
This is the nature of the hardware design in microKEYER II and
not something that can (or will) be addressed in Router.
73,
... Joe Subich, W4TV
microHAM America
http://www.microHAM-USA.com
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/microHAM
support e-mail: support@microHAM-com
On 7/1/2010 2:36 AM, Gary AL9A wrote:
> Wayne,
>
> As a Vista user I have mixed emotions about the coming change to WriteLog.
> It will be great to get more control over the audio in Vista, but I hate to
> lose the "Echo Microphone" capability of recording both TX and RX from a
> single sound board. I use the microHAM microkeyer II and it has been great.
> If I need two sound boards to record both the TX and RX I hope the WL Sound
> Board Mixer will be able to use both the on board sound chip in my Dell
> laptop and the sound card in the MKII. Perhaps Joe could chime in and
> advise if this configuration is possible with the microHAM router and MKII.
>
> 73,
> Gary AL9A
>
_______________________________________________
WriteLog mailing list
WriteLog@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
WriteLog on the web: http://www.writelog.com/
|