On 12/3/2018 1:13 PM, Tom Georgens wrote:
> If Wayne can match the audio quality of the Remote Rig, this is the
> best and cheapest solution.
On this comparison between RemoteRig and WriteLog Remote Control, I'll
say up front I do not know whether one design has a fundamental quality
advantage over the other. I take this opportunity anyway to comment on
the differences between the two architectures.
At the conceptual level, the two are trying to accomplish the same task
for audio. To summarize: take RX audio at the remote station, digitize
it, pack it into a standard internet-ready form, and get it through the
internet interface at the remote (cable router, fiber, what-have-you),
out onto the open internet. Reverse the process at the control site to
make it audible to the operator. The mic audio for SSB is very similar.
It differs only in details like flowing in the opposite direction, you
never need more than one channel, etc.
The big difference between the two designs is that
a)WriteLog accomplishes the sound-to-internet interface requiring
Windows PCs on both ends, while
b)RemoteRig requires a dedicated hardware device at both ends.
It is reasonable to guess that the dedicated hardware would never lose
out, quality-wise, to the general purpose PC hardware. But at that point
you can't guess you have to actually test and find out.
But carefully consider the following details.
One advantage that the Remote Rig only appears to have, but might not,
is that modern rigs digitize internally and WriteLog gets its input from
such rigs over USB. For an example, WriteLog gets RX audio from a K3S
as-digitized by the rig and there is no reason, without testing, to
assume RemoteRig can do any better at digitizing. For such a rig any
quality difference comes down to a question of whether a Windows PC can
do a better job of getting the packet onto the internet (and undoing the
process on the remote end.)
WriteLog being on the Windows PC has to compete with what that PC might
otherwise think is a cool thing to be doing at the time (everyone's
favorite: upgrading Windows 10 when you least expect!) But, being on the
Windows PC, means certain mass market advantages might come into play:
like a $150 musician's USB interface that happens to do exactly what the
control site operator might need. It is reasonable to guess that such a
mass market device would do at least as good a job with audio at the
control site as the RemoteRig device does.
And, of course, there is always the problem of software quality. No
matter how good the hardware is for either design, does WriteLog
actually implement a transfer scheme that works in the real world as
well as RemoteRig? Someone besides me has to answer that question.
And please note I have carefully limited my comments here to the quality
of the audio transfer. If you're actually putting together a remoting
solution, you have to consider cost, ease of implementation, who besides
you might want to control your remote, etc. etc. etc.
Wayne, W5XD
_______________________________________________
WriteLog mailing list
WriteLog@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
WriteLog on the web: http://www.writelog.com/
|