Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] Re: 8877 failures; thoriated tungsten vs. indirectly

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] Re: 8877 failures; thoriated tungsten vs. indirectly
From: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures)
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 97 01:23:11 -0800
>
>On Tue, 18 Nov 97 12:14:38 -0800 Rich Measures <measures@vc.net> writes:
>
>>The 8877 I selected for opening this morning appears to be an example of 
>>the problem Mr. Erhorn described.  .  .  

>That would appear to be a prime candidate for your Web page photo
>collection Rich....it would at least be a change....
>
>73   Carl   KM1H
>
-  The short can not be seen.  The grid and cathode are in mint 
condition.  Compared to a gold-sputtered 8877, this is B O R I N G.  
  
Rich---

R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K   


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>