>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: km1h@juno.com [SMTP:km1h@juno.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 1998 5:44 PM
>To: amps@contesting.com
>Subject: Re: [AMPS] parasitics
>
>
>On Tue, 21 Apr 98 22:40:23 -0500 Jon Ogden <jono@webspun.com> writes:
>>>If you continue to live in a parasitic world you will never accept
>>>reality Rich. I dont intend to waste my time in an argument with someone
>>>who can not show proof to support a theory nor accept the possibility
>>>of another idea
>>>.
The problem with "another idea" is failure to explain the circumstantial
evidence.
>>>Bent filaments or anything else means absolutely squat unless a "real"
>>>engineering study can confirm your "theory". So far I find no
>>>support for it outside of a few that can offer no proof either. Myself , I
>>>dont believe it at all.
>>>
Since I know that "squat" is a euphemism for feces, I pretty much had
your Position figured out, Carl.
>>
>>Quite the contrary, Carl. You, yourself have answered some questions
>>of mine that begin to confirm some of Rich's theories.
>
>Jon, if you believe in those theories that strongly then I suggest that
>you and Rich team up and publish an article in a reputable journal. I am
>a strong believer in peer review
Such journals depend on paid advertising. The month after the critique
of "The Nearly Perfect Amplifier" was published in the Sept., 1994 issue
of *QST*:
1. the employer of Mr. Tom Rauch paid for 30-something full pages of
*QST* advertising.
2. in a letter, Mr. Rauch threatens to sue me and *QST* if my rebuttal
to the Sept., 1994 critique is published in *QST*.
3. I discovered that letters sent by ARRL members in support of the "The
Nearly Perfect Amplifier" were not being delivered to the desk of *QST*
Technical Correspondence column editor, Mr. Paul Pagel.
4. I am informed that my rebuttal will not be published in *QST*.
>and this reflector is read by only a
>tiny fraction of engineers.
>
>Until that happens I will continue to be a dis-believer and will also be
>willing to make a public apology if I am wrong.
>So how about it....does junk science really work?
>
During the grate parasitics debate, Mr. Rauch said that gold has two
melting points, and that AC Circuit Analysis does not apply to parallel
Ls/Rs VHF parasitic suppressors (shortly after AC Circuit Analysis
disproved his theory that virtually no VHF current flows in Ls). .
Junk Science? . . Wes' copyrighted scientific measurements with a
Hewlett-Packard Model 4191A RF Impedance Analyzer speak for themselves,
even though he apparently would rather not. .
>[Richard W. Ehrhorn].....
>.....
cheers
Rich...
R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|