| To: | <amps@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [AMPS] slam tally |
| From: | Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick) |
| Date: | Wed, 9 Jun 1999 12:50:32 +0100 |
Rich says;
>? Would you consider it bad form to state that alleged facts were
>contradicted by the personnel dept. of the former employer?
Rebuttal of facts is an accepted part of debate. To say that evidence is
available to rebut a set of facts stated by one of the parties, and to
produce that evidence is one thing - and is acceptable: but if one said that
'these facts presented by Mr. X are lies and I'm going to prove it', I'd
class that not only as unacceptable, but purposely inflammatory and
insulting.
73
Peter G3RZP
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [AMPS] slam tally, Rich Measures |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [AMPS] TL-922 Filament Transformer Protection, Ian White, G3SEK |
| Previous by Thread: | [AMPS] slam tally, Pete Smith |
| Next by Thread: | [AMPS] slam tally, Jon Ogden |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |