Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] Re: Poor science

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] Re: Poor science
From: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2000 17:22:32 -0500
Hi Rich,

Nice try at pulling something out of context, but what I said was 
exactly true.


> >Please copy and repost where I said that.
> >
> ? From: w8jitom@aol.com
> Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
> Subject: Re: Good source for amplifier tips
To: <amps@contesting.com>
> Date: 24 Nov 1996 03:34:24 GMT
> Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) (1.13)
> Lines: 110
> Message-ID: <19961124033600.WAA09484@ladder01.news.aol.com>
> References: <measures-ya023180002211960639420001@news.vcnet.com>
> NNTP-Posting-Host: ladder01.news.aol.com
> X-Admin: news@aol.com
> X-Newsreader: AOL Offline Reader
> >......
> ''I think though we can safely conclude making the coil out of nichrome
> mainly lowers HF Q, NOT VHF Q''. ..... 

What I said is above is perfectly correct, because we were 
discussing a conventional parallel R/L suppressor.

If you take a conventional suppressor with a parallel R and L, and 
make the L out of nichrome instead of copper, the largest change 
in Q happens at DC. As frequency moves higher and higher, the 
resistor dominates the circuit. So the largest shift in Q is at low 
frequencies.

Nice try at twisting words through omission of text Rich.

.

 
   
73, Tom W8JI
w8ji@contesting.com

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>