To: | <amps@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [AMPS] RE: Re: Re: Mission Impossible |
From: | Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick) |
Date: | Wed, 8 Mar 2000 14:03:37 -0000 |
Jan says: >Still I insist, I would never ever call a distorted signal clean, sorry guys! Seems we merely have different definitions of what is meant by a 'clean' signal: just that Tom and I appear to apply the same meaning. Chacun a son gout. 73 Peter G3RZP -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [AMPS] RE: Re: Re: Mission Impossible, Jan.E.Holm@telia.se |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [AMPS] Power Handling of Resistors, Wt8r@aol.com |
Previous by Thread: | [AMPS] RE: Re: Re: Mission Impossible, Jan.E.Holm@telia.se |
Next by Thread: | [AMPS] Suppressor measurements, Fred Fliss |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |