>
>> All I asked is whether the dipmeter option worked. Reading between the
>> lines, Joe's lit fuse tells me that he already knows the MFJ dipper option
>> is a turkey.
>>
>> end
>>
>> - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures.
>
>
>The dipmeter is a copy of a cover award-winning QST article that I
>warned Martin Jue about.
Congrats. QST does not have a Tech Editor.
> He went ahead and did it anyway,
>claiming QST checked it out.
>
>He didn't know it was like the "Nearly Perfect Amplifier" article and
>"Parasitics Revisited", all real turkey's of articles based on poor
>theories and misunderstandings of how things work.
>
On the 28th of November, 1996, on the rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
Newsgroup, Mr. Tom Rauch proposed that we work a sample problem with two
types of parasitic suppressor - the copper-wire type and the
resistance-wire type. Mr. Rauch apparently felt that working his sample
problem would straighten out my misunderstandings of how things really
work. However, a couple of days hence, Mr. Rauch suddenly cancelled the
post. He refuses to discuss the matter to this day. The sample problem
awaits. The Rp in the resistance-wire suppressor turned out to be about
45% of the Rp in the copper-wire suppressor. In other words, Tom
knows that he is riding a dead horse.
end
- Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures.
end
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
|