| To: | <amps@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [AMPS] a sticky issue. |
| From: | Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick) |
| Date: | Mon, 16 Oct 2000 10:29:02 +0100 |
Rich says: >The bottom-line on resistance-wire suppressors is that they reduce the >10m dissipative burden on R-supp. The suppressor coil wound with resistance wire has one advantage to my mind - it stays pretty much the same resistance over time; we know that carbon comp resistors do go go high. Even better is a layout and tube that doesn't need a suppressor..........but that's not always possible. 73 Peter G3RZP -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [AMPS] a sticky issue., measures |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [AMPS] 811A Plate Impedance?, measures |
| Previous by Thread: | [AMPS] a sticky issue., measures |
| Next by Thread: | [AMPS] a sticky issue., measures |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |