>
>Hi everybody,
>
>I guess I'm confused. If this tube is prone to self oscillation--which is
>what I get by reading this thread--why not try a different suppressor?
>If it works you have saved yourself a lot of aggravation it seems.
? Good idea, Steve. Since feedback-C is a constant, lower Rp is The only
practical fix.
cheers.
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
>To: "AMPS" <amps@contesting.com>; "Colin Lamb" <k7fm@teleport.com>
>Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 3:19 PM
>Subject: Re: [AMPS] Self oscillation with homebrew 3-1000Z ????
>
>
>>
>> > Rich said: "I would bypass the high-tech research, cut to the chase,
>> > and try a lower Rp suppressor". This was in response to a method of
>> > scientific approach to parasitic oscillation suppression.
>> >
>> > I suppose I should not comment on someone else's view, but it seems
>> > rather sad to reject science and resort to a magic potion.
>>
>> It is also bad advice.
>>
>> The lowest Rp suppressor would be a direct short circuit.
>>
>> So what Rich is saying, in effect, is to not use any suppressor at
>> all. That would be the lowest possible Rp.
>>
>> That is the real danger in ignoring how something works, and giving
>> a canned solution.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 73, Tom W8JI
>> W8JI@contesting.com
>>
>> --
>> FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
>> Submissions: amps@contesting.com
>> Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
>> Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
>>
>>
>
>
>--
>FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
>Submissions: amps@contesting.com
>Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
>
>
- Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures.
end
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
|