Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[Amps] 3-400Z vs. 4-400A

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [Amps] 3-400Z vs. 4-400A
From: wwd@netheaven.com (wwd@netheaven.com)
Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2002 10:29:37 -0400
In <200207060110.g661Amx23986@nimbus.heaven.net>, on 07/05/2002 
   at 06:13 PM, Richard <2@mail.vcnet.com> said:

>>>>Some time ago a guy told me he was substituting the
>>>>4-400A tube in his Swan Mark 1 amplifier instead of
>>>>using the 3-400Z tube.  He had a large supply of the
>>>>4-400A tubes on hand and said they were working very
>>>>well in the Swan Mark 1 even though it was designed
>>>>around the 3-400Z tube.  Is this an ok thing to do in
>>>>the long term?
>>>>73,
>>>In g-g, at 0v bias, the 4-400A needs c. 3400V to idle at the requisite 
>>>75mA. 
>>
>>So add some bias already. <g>
 
>Adding bias to raise the ZSAC to 75mA/tube with 3000VDC would require 
>connecting a 1A, 1 - 3 volt neg. polarity PS to the CT/cathode return. 

[grumble-grouse] .  .  .   Oh, I see, a trivial task.
-- 
wwd     K2AME








~~~~~~~~~~~~



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>