To: | Steve Thompson <g8gsq@ic24.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Amps] A Meeting Ground |
From: | R.Measures <r@somis.org> |
Date: | Fri, 5 Nov 2004 06:09:08 -0800 |
List-post: | <mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
On Nov 5, 2004, at 1:29 AM, Steve Thompson wrote: On Thursday 04 November 2004 20:14, Dennis12Amplify@aol.com wrote:Bill, Yo, Steve -- It would seem that with a low-Z path to gnd (circuit-common), more of the VHF feedback signal (result of delta-I ringing of the anode's VHF resonant circuit) would be shunted to gnd, and less of the VHF feedback signal would be arriving at the cathode/input -- which would obviously be a serious error if one is designing a VHF oscillator. - In the SB-220, there is a length of RG-58 coax between the tuned input Pi-networks and the cathodes of the 3-500Zs. A dipmeter reveals that this section of coax creates a VHF resonance that is close to the frequency of the ringing in the anode's resonant circuit. This resonance keeps the ringing signal from being shunted to gnd, and allows more feedback signal to go into the cathode. Essentially the same situation exists in the TL-922, except that the ringing frequency is c. 10MHz higher and the RG-58 is a bit shorter. Both amplifiers have a track record of big-bangs, toasted VHF parasitic-suppressors, blown grid chokes, , toasted 10-15 m contacts on bandswitches, and grid-filament shorts. -------- Editorial: Tube manufacturers list feedback C in pF, which are units of 10^–12 Farads. For instance, a 3-500Z has 0.15pF, or 0.15 x 10^–12 Farads of C. Since feedback-C is so small, most engineers seem to ignore it. If feedback-C was listed in femto-Farads (10^–15) F, the feedback spec on a 3-500Z would be: 150fF -- and, who knows, perhaps feedback C might get more respect? cheerz ... Richard L. Measures, AG6K, 805.386.3734. www.somis.org _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [Amps] ACOM 2000A Problem - IG2 should be zero ..., Carsten Esch |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] ACOM 2000A Problem - IG2 should be zero ..., R . Measures |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] A Meeting Ground, Steve Thompson |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] A Meeting Ground, Bill Turner |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |